WSJ Cuts Its Library Staff.
Comments on the article are right on the money though: long term, this is not going to save money. It will compromise quality and the brand. Not having a record of the paper for several years is also very bad idea. The WSJ can be mocked for its myopic focus on the upper echelons of finance and the wealthy and missing the whole fact that "hey, the economy's gonna blow up like an atomic bomb!" it is still the US daily finance paper of record. I used to read it for fun back at the law firm.
Warning: catty bitch comment ahead. I do not have any sympathy for people who seek to bring up their own medical conditions and family life as reasons why their tale of unemployment is so much more tragic than anyone else's. Cry me a river; it's hard times for us all. It's very librarian though.
3 comments:
Well, and given my feelings on how its reporters missed all signs of coming trouble, you can imagine my enthusiasm for their having LESS able research help.
Did you notice that Mesa is now larger than Cleveland?
Population wise, city proper versus city proper--absolutely. Cleveland and Phoenix share a wicked sprawl problem and half the people who say they live in each city actually live in a suburb though.
Post a Comment